I use the DIR-655 in my lab and consider it a solid performer. >1) Make sure the D-Link DIR-655 has the latest FW. Then after reading suggestions here I set the printer IP to Manual (same address), still keeping it reserved within the DHCP range in the router. Originally I had the printer IP set to Auto (I believe this was the default) and reserved in the router, within the DHCP range. > Is the static/reserved IP address inside or outside the DHCP range? Typically, reserving within DHCP and setting static outside DHCP works best. Should I try this? Any other suggestions? The client likes the printer but is just about ready to look elsewhere for one if I can't solve this for them soon. The client's router is the first one listed:Īs I indicated at the beginning of this post, I think the only suggestion in this thread that I haven't tried yet is the #4 suggestion to the Linksys user: select In an infrastructure network use 802.11b/g behavior. The printer's network summary report follows. The router's Auto-Channel Select is disabled and the wireless channel is set to 1. In addition to the Manual IP, the printer is set to Manual Default Gateway (blank) and Manual DNS (blank). The router's wireless mode is set to Mixed (n/g/b) and the Channel Width is set to 20MHz. The printer is set to use a static IP address, which is also reserved for the printer in the router. The printer is set to authenticate via WPA as well. Wireless security is WPA Personal, (TKIP or AES). The router is a DLink DIR 655, with the latest firmware. As reported by others, even single-page print jobs print extremely slowly - from all 3 computers - and while the job is in progress the computer printing the job will sometimes display a message indicating the printer failed to print, even though it eventually does finish printing. Installation of the printer drivers and detection of the printer went smoothly on all 3 computers. The printer is installed wireless and being used by 3 computers: a wired desktop (WinXP SP3), a wireless laptop (Win7) and a wireless MacBook (OSX). I thought I would run this by you folks first. I have tried all the suggestions in this thread, except one. I hope this thread is still being monitored, as I have just installed one of these printers for a client and we're experiencing the same problem. Business PCs, Workstations and Point of Sale Systems.Printer Wireless, Networking & Internet.DesignJet, Large Format Printers & Digital Press.Printing Errors or Lights & Stuck Print Jobs.Notebook Hardware and Upgrade Questions. The internal updater for Firefox 3.0 doesn't offer it, as of yet. I haven't tested those two filters, but they are likely to be weak as they have been in all browsers. Many of the others, like antimalware and antiphising are listed as improved. Private browsing and Forget This Site are the new ones listed. there's a whole list of features listed at the Mozilla Firefox security page. Other features include geolocation, the ability to drag tabs to be their own window, and adding a window as a new tab in a different browser window. Once i started using it, it was like tabbed browsing. I didn't think it was a big deal when Opera had it and then when Safari 4 added it. You can get it with add-ons for Firefox, but this is becoming a standard feature of these days. Missing is a top sites feature, like Safari and Opera have. My guess is that it won't mean much until more file types are supported. If web developers make more use of Ogg files, then this could be good. you can see a demo of a video that also showcases the new features. Most things people watch online aren't using this. However, it's only the open source Ogg file types. It supports some video types natively, without the need for a plug-in or 3rd party add-on. You can always just clear your private data manually.įirefox 3.5 does have one thing that no other browser has. Nothing groundbreaking, but handy to have. Google Chrome launched with it and spread awareness, even getting the nickname "porn mode". One thing you'll see that is new is the private browsing feature. Safari is still faster for me going loading new pages, but clicking back to ones in your history, it's still Firefox. I do notice that Firefox doesn't compare itself to other browsers like Safari and IE but the earlier 3.0 and 2 versions. It seems like everyone is touting their new, even faster browser. Speed is one thing that Firefox 3.5 is touted as having over the older version. Tried doing just about everything you can with a browser and it all went well. I've run it for a few hours and haven't had any issues. Most of the changes are underneath, so they aren't readily apparent. A big update, since the version went from 3.0 to 3.5. Probably not a secret to most, but the latest version of Firefox is out.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |